Runway with slogan

Fashion made possible by global trade

Fashion made possible by global trade

Fashion made possible by global trade

Manufacturing

  • NBC News: How an Oklahoma denim-maker supports creating American-made jeans

    On 13 August deadline, NBC News reports on the difficulties of made-in-america apparel.

    By Jing Feng and Vicky Nguyen | August 13, 2025

    The following is an excerpt....

    Only 2.5% of clothing sold in America is produced domestically, according to AllAmerican.org, a U.S. manufacturing advocacy group. The rest is imported from places like China, Vietnam, India and Bangladesh, where labor is much cheaper. In the 1990s, U.S. apparel factories employed almost a million people. Today, that number has dropped below 100,000.

    The U.S. lacks the capacity, materials and technology to meet fashion companies’ sourcing needs, said Sheng Lu, a professor of fashion and apparel studies at the University of Delaware. He also sees no clear evidence that tariff policies have driven fashion companies to source more domestically. In his 2025 Fashion Industry Benchmarking Study, over 80% of apparel companies said they plan to diversify sourcing to offset tariffs, while just 17% expect to increase sourcing from the U.S.

    Read more on NBC News 

  • New Age: Fewer US buyers take RMG from Bangladesh

    On a 21 July deadline, New Age reports on changing sourcing trends as informed by USFIA's Bencharking Survey 2026:

    Moinul Haque | July 21, 2026

     

    Bangladesh’s utilisation rate among US fashion companies has sharply fallen in 2026, while slow speed-to-market, limited supply chain flexibility, and compliance concerns remain major challenges though the country stays one of the world’s leading apparel sourcing destinations.

    According to the 2026 USFIA Benchmarking Study that covered until May, which was released on Monday, Bangladesh’s utilisation rate dropped to 78.9 per cent in 2026 from 88.2 per cent a year earlier.

    Utilisation rate refers to the frequency with which a sourcing destination was used divided by the total number of survey respondents.

    The report said that Bangladesh had tied with Vietnam, Cambodia, and Indonesia as the most-utilised apparel sourcing destination in 2026 based on the utilisation rate.

    However, it said, utilisation rates among the major Asian sourcing destinations had declined compared to the 2025 survey.

    China’s utilisation rate fell from 100 per cent to 73 per cent, while Vietnam’s dropped from 100 per cent to about 78 per cent.

    The report, however, emphasised that the decline in Bangladesh’s utilisation rate should not be interpreted as a loss of competitiveness.

    Instead, it said, the decline reflected a broader transformation in global sourcing strategies.

    According to the report, US brands identified president Trump’s protectionist trade policies as their biggest business challenge in 2026, prompting companies to reduce their sourcing exposure to countries considered most vulnerable to future trade restrictions, particularly China and Vietnam.

    Meanwhile, three non-Asian countries – Guatemala, Egypt, and Jordan – climbed to the top 10 sourcing destinations in 2026, with all of them recording higher utilisation rates than a year earlier.

    According to the report, protectionist US trade policies and tariff-related uncertainties remained the fashion industry’s biggest business challenge in 2026, with 92 per cent of the surveyed companies identifying them as their primary concern.

    It said that the average applied US tariff on apparel imports had increased to 21.6 per cent in May 2026 from 15.2 per cent before the start of President Donald Trump’s second term.

    The report also found that China and Vietnam were perceived to face the highest risk from future US import trade barriers, while Bangladesh, India, and Cambodia were considered to face moderate risk.

    In contrast, suppliers in seven CAFTA-DR member countries – USA, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua – and US domestic manufacturers were viewed as the least exposed to potential new trade restrictions.

    The survey for the 2026 Fashion Industry Benchmarking Study was carried out between April and June 2026 and covered 30 leading US fashion companies.

    Bangladesh, the report also said, achieved a historic milestone by surpassing China in the US apparel market for the first time in decades.

    During the first five months of 2026, Bangladesh accounted for 11.3 per cent of US apparel imports by value, placing it second only to Vietnam, which held a 22.2 per cent share, while China’s share declined to 9.7 per cent.

    Nearly 47 per cent of the surveyed companies reported that Bangladesh represented more than 10 per cent of their total sourcing value or volume, highlighting the country’s continued strategic importance to global buyers.

    Despite these achievements, the report identified the speed to market as one of Bangladesh’s weakest competitive areas.

    Bangladesh received a score of only 2.3 on 5 for speed to market, reflecting persistent logistical constraints and the country’s geographical distance from major consumer markets, it said.

    While Bangladesh continued to excel in cost-efficient, large-scale production, its longer lead times became a competitive disadvantage as international retailers increasingly demanded faster inventory replenishment and shorter fashion cycles, findings suggested.

    Despite the lower utilisation rate, the report presented an optimistic outlook for Bangladesh.

    It ranked Bangladesh as the second most popular ‘rising star’ for future sourcing expansion, with 46.7 per cent of the respondents planning to increase sourcing from the country over the next two years, second only to Indonesia.

    The report said that Bangladesh was expected to remain a dominant force in global apparel sourcing through 2028.

    However, it said, sustaining that position would depend on the country’s ability to improve logistics, reduce lead times, strengthen domestic textile production, enhance labour and environmental compliance, and increase manufacturing flexibility while preserving its long-standing cost advantage.

    The report also highlighted Bangladesh’s limited flexibility in accommodating smaller and specialised orders.

    It said that Bangladesh had received a minimum order quantity score of 2.6, significantly below China’s leading score of 4.0.

    According to the study, this indicated that Bangladesh remained primarily geared towards high-volume production of basic garments rather than smaller, more diverse production runs increasingly sought by international brands.

    Vertical integration remained an area requiring improvement, the report also said.

    Although Bangladesh scored 3.4 for vertical manufacturing capability, outperforming several competing countries, it continued to trail China, which scored 4.8, and India, which scored 4.0.

    Most US fashion companies, the report said, still depended heavily on China for textile raw materials, including fabrics and accessories, increasing Bangladesh’s dependence on imported inputs and limiting its ability to shorten production lead times.

    Bangladesh received a labour and social compliance score of 2.2 and an environmental compliance score of 2.4, placing it among the lower-performing sourcing destinations in these areas, it also said.

    According to the report, improving traceability, labour standards, and environmental performance would be essential as international brands faced increasingly stringent regulatory requirements, including the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act and emerging Extended Producer Responsibility laws.

    The study found that Bangladesh was perceived as carrying a relatively high risk from future US import trade barriers, receiving a score of 2.2.

    Unlike suppliers in the Western Hemisphere that benefited from preferential trade agreements, the survey noted, Bangladesh remained subject to standard tariff arrangements, increasing cost pressures at a time when protectionist trade policies were becoming a growing concern for apparel companies.

    Respondents awarded Bangladesh a sourcing cost score of 4.3 on 5, tying it with China as the highest-rated sourcing destination for cost competitiveness.

    The report said that Bangladesh’s established low-cost manufacturing base continued to provide international fashion brands with an effective hedge against rising global inflation and shipping costs.

    According to the report, US fashion companies were moving away from the traditional concentration of orders in the three largest sourcing countries – China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh – and were increasingly distributing production across a wider range of markets to reduce geopolitical, regulatory, and supply chain risks.

    During 2026, companies reported sourcing from 49 countries, up from 46 a year ago.

    Emerging destinations such as Indonesia, Cambodia, Egypt, Jordan and Guatemala, the report said, were attracting increasing attention as buyers sought a more geographically balanced sourcing portfolio.

    It said that imports from non-Asian countries had reached 15.8 per cent of the total US apparel imports, the highest level in more than a decade.

    The report also said that buyers were consolidating rather than expanding their supplier networks.

    Nearly half of the surveyed companies said that they planned to work with fewer suppliers over the next two years, preferring stronger strategic partnerships with vendors capable of providing greater traceability, compliance, and operational resilience.

  • The Daily Star: India’s US tariff parity: Real threat or overblown fear for Bangladesh?

    On a 17 February deadline, the Daily Store reports on the recent US-India trade deal in relation to Bangladesh.

    Refayet Ullah Mirdha| February 17, 2026

    The following is an excerpt....

    India has been steadily expanding its presence in the US apparel market, and the numbers are striking.

    According to the US Fashion Industry Association’s (USFIA) Fashion Industry Benchmarking study in 2025, cited on February 6 this year by Vogue Business, 77 percent of surveyed US fashion brands and retailers reported sourcing from India in 2025, with 60 percent planning to expand sourcing through 2027.

    India captured 6.5 percent of US apparel imports by value in the first 11 months of 2025, up from 5.7 percent in 2022, according to US International Trade Commission data.

    The country has become the third-largest supplier of men’s cotton knit tops to the US market, behind Vietnam and Bangladesh, with strong performance in women’s blouses, babywear, and home textiles.

    India’s apparel shipments to the US reached approximately $5.33 billion in fiscal year 2024-2025, roughly a third of the country’s total apparel exports.

    Read the full article here. 

  • The Daily Star: US textile bodies question reciprocal trade pact clause

    On a 24 July deadline, the Daily Store reports on USFIA's submitted industry association reciprocal trade pact clause letter:

    Refayet Ullah Mirdha| July 24, 2026

     
    The following is an excerpt....

    However, in a recent letter to the United States Trade Representative (USTR), the National Council of Textile Organizations, American Apparel & Footwear Association, United States Fashion Industry Association and US Industrial and Narrow Fabrics Institute questioned the effectiveness of the mechanism.

    “We note that USTR has proposed a tariff rate quota (TRQ) that we believe was modelled in part on what it previously negotiated with Bangladesh and Indonesia,” the leaders of the trade bodies wrote in the letter.

    They said the textile clause was unlikely to create significant or immediate jobs or business opportunities in the United States and would not provide companies with the certainty needed for long-term investment and sourcing decisions.

    Instead of relying on the ART, the bodies suggested that the USTR introduce a new textile mechanism under its Section 301 investigation. They also called on the USTR to focus on reopening closed textile factories in the United States, saying this would bring greater benefits to American clothing retailers.

    Section 301 is a US trade investigation into imports made with forced labour. Following the investigation in April, the USTR proposed tariffs of 10 percent and 12.5 percent on exports from economies that fail to prove their products do not contain raw materials made with forced labour.

    The trade bodies said any textile incentive should be linked to this new system, provided it is designed properly.

    Mohammad Abdur Razzaque, chairman of Research and Policy Integration for Development (RAPID), said Bangladesh could face challenges if the Section 301 measures are enforced because its exports rely on raw materials imported from countries where forced labour may be used.

    “The United States may be using the Section 301 investigation as a geopolitical tool. At this stage, there is no meaningful commercial benefit. It is a matter for further discussion,” Razzaque said, referring to the potential benefits of the textile mechanism in the ART.

    Although the agreement was signed five months ago, the USTR has yet to explain how the textile clause will operate. Leaders of Bangladesh’s textile and garment sectors have repeatedly sought clarification, including during the visit of a USTR delegation and in meetings with officials at the US embassy in Dhaka.

    Among all the provisions in the ART, the textile clause is seen as the only one that could directly benefit Bangladesh, although its impact depends on how the USTR implements it.

    “We have asked the USTR and US embassy officials in Dhaka to explain the textile clause of the ART at several meetings, but we have yet to receive a response,” said Mahmud Hasan Khan, president of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA).

    “We are frustrated because we still do not have an explanation of the textile clause. Our buyers keep asking about it, and the delay is affecting our business decisions,” he added.

    Read the full article here.

About

The United States Fashion Industry Association (USFIA) is dedicated to fashion made possible by global trade.

USFIA represents brands, retailers, importers, and wholesalers based in the United States and doing business globally. Founded in 1989, USFIA works to eliminate tariff and non-tariff barriers that impede the fashion industry’s ability to trade freely and create jobs in the United States.

Headquartered in Washington, DC, USFIA is the voice of the fashion industry in front of the U.S. government as well as international governments and stakeholders.  With constant, two-way communication, USFIA staff and counsel serve as the eyes and ears of our members in Washington and around the world, enabling them to stay ahead of the regulatory challenges of today and tomorrow. Through our publications, educational events, and networking opportunities, USFIA also connects with key stakeholders across the value chain including U.S. and international service providers, suppliers, and industry groups.

 

News

The State of Tariffs

President Trump has made sweeping changes to U.S. tariffs since he began his second term in January 2025. From the Liberation Day tariffs to the various Section 122 and 301 investigations and tariffs, U.S. trade has shifted more in the past year than almost anytime in history. USFIA is pleased to provide the following resources to those wanting to learn more about the state of tariffs in 2026.

fas fa-chart-line
10
Current baseline tariff on all trading partners

Imposed under Section 122, these temporary tariffs are set to expire on July 24, 2026.

fas fa-earth-americas
60
Countries threatened with Section 301 forced labor tariffs

A new 10% or 12.5% tariff on 60 U.S. trading partners under USTR's Section 301 forced labor investigation.

fas fa-money-bill-trend-up
121.7
in potential and certified refunds accepted in CAPE

CBP has accepted over a hundred billion in potentials and certified refunds since opening CAPE as of July 10, 2026.

Events

Reports

2026 USFIA Fashion Industry Benchmarking Study

The 2026 USFIA Fashion Industry Benchmarking study is now available to the public! Key findings from the report include:

  • The top business challenges facing U.S. fashion companies continue to center on the Trump Administration’s tariff policies, though concerns over inflation and increasing costs have also risen since 2025. 
  • 92% of respondents rated “Protectionist U.S. trade policies and related policy uncertainty, including the impact of the Trump tariffs” as one of their top two business challenges in 2026.
  • Among business concerns, managing forced-labor risks emerged as a significantly higher priority, rising from tenth place in 2025 to sixth place in 2026 and illustrating the industry's commitment to eradicating forced labor from their supply chains.
  • The job market is a bright spot. About 87% of companies plan to increase hiring over the next five years, up from last year and tying the highest level since the pandemic. Demand is expected to be strongest for data scientists, trade compliance specialists, and environmental sustainability specialists
  • AI is becoming increasingly integrated into apparel sourcing and business operations. 56% utilize AI for "demand forecasting and inventory planning," while 50% use it for "sustainability tracking," "risk management" and “sourcing strategy and cost optimization.”

Download the 2026 study here.

If you're interested in sharing your company's perspective for our 2027 study, fill out the interest form.

 Benchmarking 2026 top business challenges


Higher tariffs continue to trigger ripple effects across supply chains.

Figure 1-3 U.S. fashion companies reported deepened economic impacts of tariff hikes and policy uncertainties on their sourcing and business operations

Figure 1-4 U.S. fashion companies explored various methods to mitigate the evolving impacts of tariff hikes and policy uncertainties

 


Trends to watch: 

AI use could become increasingly prevalent in apparel sourcing as companies seek new technologies to improve operational efficiency and navigate a more complex, uncertain sourcing environment.Figure 2-24 AI is increasingly integrated into apparel sourcing and business operations


 

2026 Sourcing Trends & Outlook

USFIA's 2026 Sourcing Trends & Outlook is out with data from the full year of 2025. Members can log-in to the website to download it here

This is the thirteenth USFIA Sourcing Trends & Outlook Report, our annual look at the sourcing landscape for the fashion industry. 2025 will be remembered as the year of the Trump tariffs. U.S. imports fell as brands and retailers had to navigate a new level of uncertainty for sourcing and for costs. The reciprocal tariffs affected all countries, except for USMCA-qualifying production from Canada and Mexico.

As we look ahead to 2026, there still is a lot of uncertainty. The reciprocal tariffs were struck down by the Supreme Court, but the Trump Administration still is committed to impose tariffs above the MFN rates. The global tariffs imposed under Section 122 expire on July 24th and Administration officials say they will use other trade laws such as Section 301 and Section 232 to authorize more tariffs.

Even with the tariff disruptions, some of the major sourcing trends remain the same as in recent years. Asian suppliers continue to dominate apparel sourcing. The top seven apparel suppliers are China, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, and Pakistan, and they ship 78% of apparel imports.

The top 5 sourcing trends in the report are:

  1. Asian apparel suppliers continue to dominate sourcing.
  2. China maintains its role as the top apparel supplier by quantity, and Vietnam is the top supplier by value.
  3. Average unit values for textiles and apparel imports had only modest increases.
  4. Some of the fastest growth in 2025 comes from major apparel suppliers.
  5. Despite tariff disruptions, FTAs and preference programs remain underutilized. CAFTA remains the major duty-free supplier.

 

While U.S. apparel imports decreased from many suppliers, there still are some clear winners from the tariff disruptions. Five of the top ten suppliers had double digit increases. Some of the fastest-growing suppliers are Asian-based apparel industries that took market share from China.

sourcing2026 fastest growing apparel suppliers

 

sourcing2026 applied tariff rates

Chart courtesy of Dr. Sheng Lu, Professor in the Department of Fashion and Apparel Studies, University of Delaware.

Partners

Subscribe to USFIA's Mailing List