On a 2 April deadline, Sourcing Journal discusses the recent trend in reshoring due to tariff policy:
Kate Nishimura | April 2, 2026
The following is an excerpt...
Beginning May 1, manufacturers across NAICS Sectors 31–33—including factories, plants and mills engaged in the production of durable and non-durable goods like textiles, food, electronics and machinery—will become eligible for the expanded ITL Program.
Those that are approved for the loans can use them to upgrade or replace equipment to improve productivity and margins, modernize their facilities and production lines, build more resilient inventory positions, and expand operations and capacity through strategic acquisitions, the SBA said. The goal is to “[d]iversify supply chains away from foreign adversaries and bring critical production back to the United States.”
“The enhanced SBA funding builds on the Trump Administration’s broader commitment to reshoring American industry and domestic supply chains,” the SBA added.
There’s little to show that the administration’s efforts—including its tariff regime—have prompted a reshoring wave within the fashion and textiles sector. The U.S. Fashion Industry Association’s (USFIA) 2025 benchmarking study revealed “[n]o clear evidence indicates that the Trump Administration’s tariff policy has successfully encouraged U.S. fashion companies to increase domestic sourcing of ‘Made in the USA’ textile and apparel products or to expand sourcing from the Western Hemisphere.” At the time, just 44 percent of the group’s survey respondents, which included 25 leading brands and retailers, said they planned to expand sourcing from the Western Hemisphere, and just 17 percent said they planned to source more goods from the U.S.
The tides could be shifting, though, along with ever-changing geopolitics and evolving trade policy. A KPMG study released this week showed that 26 percent of large American companies are either planning or executing reshoring initiatives, up from just 10 percent six months ago. Almost two-fifths said they were accelerating their domestic production strategies, and over half were prioritizing investments in their U.S. operations.