On a 23 July deadline, World Business Outlook reports on small business sourcing flexibility requirements as researched in USFIA's 2026 Benchmarking Study.
July 23, 2026
The following is an excerpt...
...
Why Supply Chain Resilience Now Means Something Different
Tariffs have become the industry’s central sourcing concern. The Business of Fashion–McKinsey State of Fashion 2026 survey identified tariffs as fashion executives’ number-one hurdle. The 2025 USFIA Fashion Industry Benchmarking Study found that 60% of respondents planned to source from more countries outside China, showing why geographic diversification dominates the current resilience discussion.
The same USFIA study found that more than 70% of respondents said higher tariffs increased sourcing costs and squeezed margins. Diversifying countries is a legitimate response, but it assumes enough volume, working capital, and staff to qualify and manage suppliers across several regions. Many smaller brands do not have that capacity.
...
What Smaller Brands Are Doing Instead
Smaller brands are using a different hedge: reducing the size of each commitment instead of spreading commitments across more countries. That can mean shorter production runs, more frequent purchase orders, and raw-material orders matched to near-term demand. A smaller order does not remove tariff or shipping risk, but it limits the cash and inventory exposed to one shipment. For teams that cannot justify full-roll purchases, Global Fabric Wholesale sells fabric by the yard instead of requiring bulk rolls, allowing material orders to stay closer to the needs of the next production run.
The trade-off is cost. Smaller, more frequent orders often carry a higher unit price than one bulk order, so the strategy suits brands that prioritize cash protection and inventory control over the lowest possible unit cost. It also depends on supplier reliability. Ordering less from an unreliable partner only creates more frequent exposure to the same problem.