Runway with slogan

Fashion made possible by global trade

Fashion made possible by global trade

Fashion made possible by global trade

Tariffs

  • Just Style: What’s next for apparel sourcing in 2026?

    On a 16 December deadline, Sourcing Journal reports on tariffs' effect in 2025.

    Isatou Ndure| December 16, 2025

    The following is an excerpt....

    How can brands plan when tariffs shift overnight?

    United States Fashion Industry Association (USFIA) president Julie Hughes exclusively tells Just Style: “While we hope 2026 will be different, we anticipate that fashion brands and retailers will continue to face uncertainty for sourcing to the US because of the Trump tariffs.”

    In May 2025, US President Donald Trump paused the 145% tariffs on Chinese goods for 90 days. By mid-August 2025, the tariff truce was extended until 10 November, with the US keeping a 30% tariff on Chinese imports and China maintaining 10% on US goods.

    “Unpredictability will make it difficult for brands and retailers to be confident in their sourcing strategies since everything could be turned upside down by sudden changes in tariffs,” adds Hughes.

    She says that even if the Supreme Court blocks reciprocal tariffs, “the Administration says they will use other types of tariff measures… the threat of more tariffs remains a key risk for sourcing.”

    Read the full article here. 

  • Just-Style: New China tariffs will create supply chain "chaos"

    By Beth Wright

    The news has sparked "deep concern" among the US fashion industry and retailers who claim Trump's tariff action is cruel to American interests - particularly since companies are only given one week's notice ahead of the 10% tariff enforcement - and will create "chaos" for the fashion industry's supply chains.

    In a statement, the United States Fashion Industry Association (USFIA) said it "strongly opposes" the tariff action which, in addition to amounting to a tax on consumers, will add considerable disruption to the supply chain.

    Click here to read the entire article on the Just-Style website.

  • Just-Style: Testimony Takeaways - How New China Tariffs Could Hit U.S. Apparel Trade

    By Leonie Barrie 

    The fear of the imminent rise in new tariffs on virtually all U.S. imports from China – including textiles, apparel and footwear – seems to have abated for now. But what’s potentially at stake was set out by dozens of executives from apparel and footwear brands, retailers and importers who took part in a series of recent hearings in Washington. Here’s what they had to say.

    While the 301 tariffs might result in trade diversion from China, it will not lead to more sourcing in the United States. We often hear that argument that uncertainty and disruption to global supply chains will lead to more jobs here in the U.S., as manufacturers return from overseas. That’s not the case for the fashion industry. The manufacturing capacity and the workers are not in the United States. – Julia Hughes, president of the United States Fashion Industry Association (USFIA)

    Click here to read the full article.

  • Just-Style: Trump ramps up the trade war with new China tariffs

    By Leonie Barrie

    The impact of the tariff uncertainty is prompting U.S. fashion sourcing executives to move production out of China in response.

    A recent survey published by the United States Fashion Industry Association (USFIA) found 83% of respondents expect to decrease sourcing from China over the next two years.

    Click here to read the full article on Just-Style’s website.

  • Just-Style: US clothing industry reeling over Trump's tariffs

    By Michelle Russell

    The move, however, has left the US fashion industry reeling. In a statement, the United States Fashion Industry Association (USFIA) said that while the tariffs aren't as high as those on the fashion industry--which can reach 32% on some products--they will be "catastrophic" for the US economy and jobs.

    Click here to read the entire article on the just-style website.

  • Just-Style: US fashion sector mulls tactics to tackle Trump's tariffs

    By Keith Nuthall

    A trade symposium staged last week by the United States Fashion Industry Association (USFIA) united clothing sector executives, compliance chiefs, customs specialists, and government affairs managers.

    It was, USFIA president Julia Hughes told just-style, "an important time for industry executives to meet in Washington DC and hear directly from Congress and administration officials."

    Click here to read the entire article on the just-style website.

  • Marketplace: Americans are paying tariffs. Period.

    USFIA President Julia Hughes joins Marketplace for a discussion on the effects of the trade war on consumers. 

    Click here to listen to the full interview. 

     

     

     

     

  • Marketplace: The next round of tariffs will hit the U.S. fashion industry

    By Kai Ryssdal

    The Trump administration will impose tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese products starting next week as President Donald Trump first threatened in June. Hundreds of people have testified and submitted written comments about the impact of the proposed tariffs on U.S. industries, including Julia Hughes, president of the United States Fashion Industry Association. Now that the White House is moving forward on its proposal, Marketplace host Kai Ryssdal got Hughes back on the phone to check in.

    Click here to listen to or read the entire interview on the Marketplace website.

  • MHI Solutions: The Apparel and Textile Industry Navigates a Forever‑Shifting Landscape

    MHI Solutions reports on sourcing trends as found in USFIA's 2025 and 2026 Benchmarking Studies: 

    Tom Gresham | July 20, 2026


     THE SUPPLY CHAIN for the apparel and textile industry is vast and reaches across a wide spectrum of interested parties. According to the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO), the U.S. textile industry, its domestic suppliers and customers comprise yarn and fabric manufacturers; suppliers in the cotton, wool and manmade fiber sectors; dyers, printers and finishers; the machinery and textile chemical industries; and the many customers in the U.S. apparel industry.

    Altogether, the U.S. textile industry supply chain— including everything from textile fibers to apparel and other sewn products—employed more than 450,000 workers last year. NCTO cites statistics estimating that each textile manufacturing job in the U.S. supports three other positions. U.S. textile and apparel shipments totaled more than $60 billion in 2025, according to NCTO, and the industry invested approximately $34 billion in new plants and equipment between 2017 and 2024.

    “The U.S. textile industry, suppliers and our customers are an important component of the U.S. economy and are found in every region of the country,” according to NCTO.

    “The industry provides much‑needed jobs in rural areas and has functioned as a springboard for workers out of poverty into good‑paying jobs for generations.”

    The textile and apparel field has experienced a period of disruption that stretches from the pandemic through the recent tariff wars. By its nature, the apparel and fashion industry is a global one, making it vulnerable to disruptions around the world—and making it critical for those organizations operating in the field to prioritize flexibility and resilience.

    “Today’s fashion industry is deeply intertwined with sustainability, international relations, trade policy and technology,” said Sheng Lu, a professor in the Department of Fashion and Apparel Studies at the University of Delaware.

    The apparel industry is one that especially relies on global sourcing networks.

    “While global supply chains have enabled cost efficiencies and scalability, they also introduce exposure to disruptions, from shipping delays to geopolitical risks,” according to a report by Kinaxis, a supply chain software provider.

    In a 2025 interview with the global fashion journal Modaes, Lu reflected on the impact the pandemic had on the industry—and continues to have.

    “People still deeply remember the lessons they learned from COVID, as well as the ripple effect it had that continues even five years after it ended,” he said. “One thing companies learned was the importance of flexibility and agility in deciding where to source their products. At the time, many were heavily dependent on sourcing products from China. When the country decreed its confinement, the entire supply chain was significantly disrupted.

    “In this regard, they learned the importance of building solid strategies with suppliers. Even today, to effectively mitigate the impact of tariffs, suppliers are seen as very important partners with whom to negotiate to obtain products ahead of schedule.”

    In its report, Kinaxis emphasized that the pace of change in the fashion industry “has accelerated dramatically” in recent years—notable in an industry that was already “notoriously unpredictable.”

    “Trends can emerge overnight on social media,” according to the report. “Consumers expect constant newness. Digital commerce has expanded globally while supply chain disruptions—from logistics bottlenecks to geopolitical tensions—continue to reshape production networks. For apparel companies, this creates a paradox: they must move faster than ever while managing increasingly complex supply chains.”

    On top of that, a notable complexity for apparel supply chains is that the industry faces much higher return rates than other retail categories, meaning selling and delivering an item may only be the beginning of its supply chain journey.

    In the United States Fashion Industry Association’s Sourcing Trends & Outlook Report for 2026, the association noted that 2025 would be remembered as the year of the Trump tariffs with U.S. apparel imports falling “as brands and retailers had to navigate a new level of uncertainty for sourcing and for costs.” The association also released a benchmarking study for 2025 in partnership with Lu, and that study featured a survey of executives from leading fashion brands, retailers, importers and wholesalers. They cited the U.S. tariff policies as their number one business challenge in 2025—in fact, 100% of respondents listed it as among their top challenges for the year. Those surveyed said higher tariffs have increased sourcing costs, squeezed profit margins and led to higher consumer prices.

    In a 2025 interview with the University of Delaware news operation, Lu said, “The $4 trillion fashion and apparel business today is truly ‘made anywhere in the world and sold anywhere in the world.’ In such a highly global and interconnected industry, everyone is a stakeholder—meaning there are no real winners in a tariff war.”

    The association’s report noted that major sourcing trends remained the same in many ways, with Asian suppliers dominating apparel sourcing. The top seven apparel suppliers in 2025 were China, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia and Pakistan, accounting for 78% of apparel imports. Many leading fashion companies shared that they used sourcing diversification to mitigate the impact of tariffs, particularly by diversifying their sources outside of China. Indeed, some of the fastest‑growing suppliers last year were Asian‑based apparel industries that took market share from China.

  • New Age: Fewer US buyers take RMG from Bangladesh

    On a 21 July deadline, New Age reports on changing sourcing trends as informed by USFIA's Bencharking Survey 2026:

    Moinul Haque | July 21, 2026

     

    Bangladesh’s utilisation rate among US fashion companies has sharply fallen in 2026, while slow speed-to-market, limited supply chain flexibility, and compliance concerns remain major challenges though the country stays one of the world’s leading apparel sourcing destinations.

    According to the 2026 USFIA Benchmarking Study that covered until May, which was released on Monday, Bangladesh’s utilisation rate dropped to 78.9 per cent in 2026 from 88.2 per cent a year earlier.

    Utilisation rate refers to the frequency with which a sourcing destination was used divided by the total number of survey respondents.

    The report said that Bangladesh had tied with Vietnam, Cambodia, and Indonesia as the most-utilised apparel sourcing destination in 2026 based on the utilisation rate.

    However, it said, utilisation rates among the major Asian sourcing destinations had declined compared to the 2025 survey.

    China’s utilisation rate fell from 100 per cent to 73 per cent, while Vietnam’s dropped from 100 per cent to about 78 per cent.

    The report, however, emphasised that the decline in Bangladesh’s utilisation rate should not be interpreted as a loss of competitiveness.

    Instead, it said, the decline reflected a broader transformation in global sourcing strategies.

    According to the report, US brands identified president Trump’s protectionist trade policies as their biggest business challenge in 2026, prompting companies to reduce their sourcing exposure to countries considered most vulnerable to future trade restrictions, particularly China and Vietnam.

    Meanwhile, three non-Asian countries – Guatemala, Egypt, and Jordan – climbed to the top 10 sourcing destinations in 2026, with all of them recording higher utilisation rates than a year earlier.

    According to the report, protectionist US trade policies and tariff-related uncertainties remained the fashion industry’s biggest business challenge in 2026, with 92 per cent of the surveyed companies identifying them as their primary concern.

    It said that the average applied US tariff on apparel imports had increased to 21.6 per cent in May 2026 from 15.2 per cent before the start of President Donald Trump’s second term.

    The report also found that China and Vietnam were perceived to face the highest risk from future US import trade barriers, while Bangladesh, India, and Cambodia were considered to face moderate risk.

    In contrast, suppliers in seven CAFTA-DR member countries – USA, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua – and US domestic manufacturers were viewed as the least exposed to potential new trade restrictions.

    The survey for the 2026 Fashion Industry Benchmarking Study was carried out between April and June 2026 and covered 30 leading US fashion companies.

    Bangladesh, the report also said, achieved a historic milestone by surpassing China in the US apparel market for the first time in decades.

    During the first five months of 2026, Bangladesh accounted for 11.3 per cent of US apparel imports by value, placing it second only to Vietnam, which held a 22.2 per cent share, while China’s share declined to 9.7 per cent.

    Nearly 47 per cent of the surveyed companies reported that Bangladesh represented more than 10 per cent of their total sourcing value or volume, highlighting the country’s continued strategic importance to global buyers.

    Despite these achievements, the report identified the speed to market as one of Bangladesh’s weakest competitive areas.

    Bangladesh received a score of only 2.3 on 5 for speed to market, reflecting persistent logistical constraints and the country’s geographical distance from major consumer markets, it said.

    While Bangladesh continued to excel in cost-efficient, large-scale production, its longer lead times became a competitive disadvantage as international retailers increasingly demanded faster inventory replenishment and shorter fashion cycles, findings suggested.

    Despite the lower utilisation rate, the report presented an optimistic outlook for Bangladesh.

    It ranked Bangladesh as the second most popular ‘rising star’ for future sourcing expansion, with 46.7 per cent of the respondents planning to increase sourcing from the country over the next two years, second only to Indonesia.

    The report said that Bangladesh was expected to remain a dominant force in global apparel sourcing through 2028.

    However, it said, sustaining that position would depend on the country’s ability to improve logistics, reduce lead times, strengthen domestic textile production, enhance labour and environmental compliance, and increase manufacturing flexibility while preserving its long-standing cost advantage.

    The report also highlighted Bangladesh’s limited flexibility in accommodating smaller and specialised orders.

    It said that Bangladesh had received a minimum order quantity score of 2.6, significantly below China’s leading score of 4.0.

    According to the study, this indicated that Bangladesh remained primarily geared towards high-volume production of basic garments rather than smaller, more diverse production runs increasingly sought by international brands.

    Vertical integration remained an area requiring improvement, the report also said.

    Although Bangladesh scored 3.4 for vertical manufacturing capability, outperforming several competing countries, it continued to trail China, which scored 4.8, and India, which scored 4.0.

    Most US fashion companies, the report said, still depended heavily on China for textile raw materials, including fabrics and accessories, increasing Bangladesh’s dependence on imported inputs and limiting its ability to shorten production lead times.

    Bangladesh received a labour and social compliance score of 2.2 and an environmental compliance score of 2.4, placing it among the lower-performing sourcing destinations in these areas, it also said.

    According to the report, improving traceability, labour standards, and environmental performance would be essential as international brands faced increasingly stringent regulatory requirements, including the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act and emerging Extended Producer Responsibility laws.

    The study found that Bangladesh was perceived as carrying a relatively high risk from future US import trade barriers, receiving a score of 2.2.

    Unlike suppliers in the Western Hemisphere that benefited from preferential trade agreements, the survey noted, Bangladesh remained subject to standard tariff arrangements, increasing cost pressures at a time when protectionist trade policies were becoming a growing concern for apparel companies.

    Respondents awarded Bangladesh a sourcing cost score of 4.3 on 5, tying it with China as the highest-rated sourcing destination for cost competitiveness.

    The report said that Bangladesh’s established low-cost manufacturing base continued to provide international fashion brands with an effective hedge against rising global inflation and shipping costs.

    According to the report, US fashion companies were moving away from the traditional concentration of orders in the three largest sourcing countries – China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh – and were increasingly distributing production across a wider range of markets to reduce geopolitical, regulatory, and supply chain risks.

    During 2026, companies reported sourcing from 49 countries, up from 46 a year ago.

    Emerging destinations such as Indonesia, Cambodia, Egypt, Jordan and Guatemala, the report said, were attracting increasing attention as buyers sought a more geographically balanced sourcing portfolio.

    It said that imports from non-Asian countries had reached 15.8 per cent of the total US apparel imports, the highest level in more than a decade.

    The report also said that buyers were consolidating rather than expanding their supplier networks.

    Nearly half of the surveyed companies said that they planned to work with fewer suppliers over the next two years, preferring stronger strategic partnerships with vendors capable of providing greater traceability, compliance, and operational resilience.

  • New PIIE Report: No trade tax is free: Trump’s promised tariffs will hit large flows of electronics, machinery, autos, and chemicals

    Last week, the Peterson Institute for International Economics released an analysis of which industries will be hardest hit by Trump’s proposed tariffs using current trade flows and tariff rates. For the purposes of this analysis, Julieta Contreras, Mary Lovely, and Jing Yan used the proposed 10% tariffs on all imports and 60% tariffs on Chinese imports. According to their analysis, tariff rates on textiles and clothing would increase by 40.2% if they are imported from China, 8.3% if imported from FTA partners, and 23.8% if Trump levies a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico. Textile and clothing imports from non-FTA partners would not be affected in this analysis, because they are already higher than 10%.

    You can see the figures from the analysis below:

    2024 12 11 lovely contreras yan tariffs fig1

    2024 12 11 lovely contreras yan tariffs fig2

    2024 12 11 lovely contreras yan tariffs fig3

    2024 12 11 lovely contreras yan tariffs fig4

  • New York Times Magazine: Can Vietnam Avoid Getting Hurt in the Crossfire When the Tariffs Are Flying?

    By Brook Larmer

    To offset the conflict’s negative impact, Beijing has slashed tariffs to Asian countries, a reminder, it seems, that China will remain the lone superpower in Asia long after the trade war is over. This appeal, however, may not stop the flow of manufacturers out of China to Southeast Asia. The American shoe-and-accessory maker Steve Madden, for example, is shifting its handbag production from China to Cambodia — 15 percent this year, 30 percent in 2019. (A U.S. Fashion Industry Association study released in July showed that two-thirds of all textile companies are expected to lower production in China over the next two years, citing United States trade protectionism as the top challenge.) Moving production to a new location is expensive and complicated. Given the mercurial man behind the trade war, and the chaotic churn of American politics, some executives are holding fast in hopes that it will all go away. But as new tariffs loom for another $200 billion worth of Chinese imports, with 6,031 products on its target list, the trade war no longer looks like a short-term crisis.

    Click here to read the entire article on the New York Times website.

  • PIIE: Trump’s threatened tariffs projected to damage economies of US, Canada, Mexico, and China

    Warwick McKibbin and Marcus Noland from the Peterson Institute for International Economics have published an analysis on Trump’s tariff threats “over illegal immigration and the flow of drugs.” They find that the tariffs would damage all of the economies involved, but include the caveat that “history suggests that Trump may not act on his threats.” The authors conclude that renegotiating USMCA would be preferable to the fallout from Trump’s tariff threats, though the “political uncertainty tempers hope of finding a resolution.” The potential of the threatened tariffs against China coming to fruition are higher, given Trump’s actions during his first term.

    Below we share the projected tariff scenarios.

    Figure 1 shows that the imposition of the tariff would slow growth and accelerate inflation in all three countries.

    PIIE1 GDP

    PIIE1 Inflation

    Figure 2 shows the damage that an additional 10 percent tariff could inflict on the Chinese and US economies… [and] the results of a retaliation scenario (dotted lines).

    PIIE2 GDP

    PIIE2 Inflation

    The result of combining the threats—a 25 percent tariff on Canada and Mexico and an additional 10 percent tariff on China (which retaliates)—is shown in figure 3.

    PIIE3 GDP

    PIIE3 Inflation

  • POLITICO: U.S. textile producers, importers square off over China tariffs

    By Doug Palmer

    "Tariffs on clothing, footwear and other fashion products would constitute a huge, regressive tax increase," Julia Hughes, president of the United States Fashion Industry Association, told the panel. "For many of these products, China remains the No. 1 supplier in the world, with no realistic options for other sourcing destinations that could replace China."...

    But the fashion sector argues that it supports "higher-paying" jobs in areas such as design, product development, logistics, sourcing and services even if major cutting and sewing operations have mainly moved outside the United States.  

    "Retail operations alone support 42 million jobs — or 1 in 4 American jobs," Hughes said.

    Click here to read the entire article on the Politico Pro website.

  • PPI Trade Fact of the Week: Canada, Mexico, and China are the U.S.’ three largest trading partners

    Ed Gresser, PPI’s Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets, published his trade fact of the week and he uses Maine to illustrate how much damage the IEEPA tariffs can cause.  

    Susan Collins (R-Maine) thinks of Maine businesses and (noting this week’s Arctic-level Lewiston thermometer readings) fears a sudden spike in home heating bills:

    “The Maine economy is integrated with Canada, our most important trading partner. Certain tariffs will impose a significant burden on many families, manufacturers, the forest products industry, small businesses, lobstermen, and agricultural producers. For example, 95 percent of the heating oil used by most Mainers to heat their homes comes from refineries in Canada.”

    To put a number on this, Maine bought $2.73 billion worth of fuel oil, mostly for heating oil from Canada last year, so Mr. Trump’s midwinter 10% energy tariff would have hit the state’s 590,000 households with a new $270 million bill. …

    What then are the Senators’ options? Their concern about rising costs for farmers and lobster boat captains, cold homes, threats to jobs, and stretched family budgets is actually linked very closely to the first principle of response — defend the Constitution and oppose attempts to rule by decree. The Constitution’s tariff clause is not at all blurry: “Congress shall have the Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises.” So Republican Senators and Representatives have no need to plead for special carveouts and exemptions. They have all the power they need to keep potash and heating oil prices down, and to preserve Congress’ constitutional authority from Mr. Trump’s power grab, by voting. They just need to use it.

  • PPI Trade Fact of the Week: Trump tariffs more likely to shrink than enlarge U.S. manufacturing industry

    Ed Gresser, PPI’s Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets, published his trade fact of the week to show how the IEEPA tariffs may be intended to support U.S. manufacturing, but actually the tariffs are more likely to hurt manufacturers.

    Imports of business inputs – “intermediate goods” like chemicals and metals, raw materials like energy and metal ores, and capital goods such as power equipment — are substantially larger than imports of consumer goods. So the Trump tariffs are likely to raise U.S. production costs even more than they raise mall and grocery prices. …

    With this in mind, some specially protected “manufacturing sectors” might gain. But U.S. manufacturing in general will have higher costs and probably get relatively smaller. The earlier round of Trump tariffs provides some guidance here: per a 2023 U.S. International Trade Commission study, the 2018 steel and aluminum tariffs over three years raised the two metals’ output by $2.2 billion, but simultaneously shrank the U.S. auto parts, machinery, toolmaking and other metal-using industries by $3.5 billion. On a larger scale, since the metals and “301” tariffs on Chinese goods in 2018/2019, manufacturing has fallen from 10.9% to 9.9% of U.S. GDP.  Real manufacturing output growth and employment totals, meanwhile, have slowed from the annual $40 billion and 100,000 net jobs averages of the post-financial crisis Obama years to $30 billion and 30,000.

  • PPI Trade Fact of the Week: U.S. clothing tariffs are unfair to women

    PPI’s Ed Gresser, Vice President and Director for Trade and Global Markets, once again highlights how import tariffs unfairly target women’s clothing in his latest trade fact of the week. Building on his Valetines Day trade fact covering higher tariffs for women’s underwear, Gresser’s latest piece looks at women’s and men’s clothing overall, finding that “combining all the categories, tariff rates on women’s clothing are on average 16.7%, 2.9 percentage points higher than the 13.6% average for men’s.”

    Gresser also notes that FTAs don’t help much and may even amplify the issue with restrictive and complex rules of origin. The New Democrat Coalition in the House published an eight-point trade policy plan which includes the goal to “advance equity in trade policy by considering solutions to reduce gender bias and regressivity in the tariff system.”

    Gresser writes that the findings point to systemic problems with U.S. tariffs for clothing:

    What does this all mean in practice? Last year’s tariff payments totaled $4.7 billion on $31.1 billion worth of women’s clothes, and $3.1 billion for $24.2 billion worth of men’s clothes. Or, in more direct terms, markups and U.S. transport and overhead costs mean that the cost of an average shirt or coat roughly quadruples from arrival at the border to the cashier, the tariff system appears to be raising the price women pay for clothes, relative to men, by an average of an extra dollar per garment. Looking at this another way, a 2018 working paper from the U.S International Trade Commission concluded that the higher rates on women’s clothes — their finding, pre-“301” tariff, was 14.9% for women’s clothes and 12.0% for men’s — plus the fact that women on average tend to purchase more clothing than men, meant that buyers of women clothes shouldered an additional $2.77 billion in tariff burden than buyers of men’s clothes. Gender bias in the tariff system accounted for about $1.8 billion extra burden on buyers of women’s clothing as of 2015, and presumably somewhat more now.

  • PPI: Brace yourself: Trump’s trade war is about to make Americans poorer

    Writing in an op-ed for The Hill, PPI Founder and President Will Marshall highlights the problems with President Trump’s use of tariffs to attempt a restructuring of the world’s economy.

    The president can sign all the executive orders he pleases, but he can’t throw history into reverse or repeal basic economics.

    Marshall points out that Americans “aren’t buying MAGAnomics.”

    Consumer confidence has plummeted to a 12-year low, with families cutting back on spending in anticipation of a return to high living costs. 

    Investors are rattled too. By mid-March, the stock market had lost more than $3 trillion since Trump took office — the equivalent of 10 percent of America’s $30 trillion GDP. 

    In a recent YouGov poll, 61 percent of voters said tariffs hurt average working people, while just 14 percent said they would help.

    And takes on Trump’s attempt to return manufacturing jobs to America.

    The president apparently sees tariffs as a form of reparations for working Americans. But the culprit isn’t trade or globalization or “neoliberalism.” It’s the emergence of a post-industrial economy shaped mainly by technological change, rising education levels and growing demand for services.  

    Factory employment has declined in all advanced countries, even manufacturing powerhouses like Germany and Japan. But thanks to tech-driven productivity gains, U.S. manufacturing output has increased by more than 60 percent since 1999, even as our factory workforce has contracted by about 25 percent.

    The U.S., like most other high-income countries, has evolved into a predominantly service-based economy. Services account for 80 percent of non-farm jobs. Even if more factories sprout up here, job gains are likely to be modest due to automation. 

    In fact, since Trump’s first set of tariffs, manufacturing employment has stagnated, up by only 30,000 since 2018, compared to 400,000 in the second Obama term.  

    And with over half a million manufacturing jobs open over the last five years, blue-collar workers themselves appear ambivalent about factory careers. 

    A 2023 YouGov poll commissioned by the Progressive Policy Institute asked non-college workers where they think their children will find the best jobs and careers. Most (44 percent) choose the communications and digital economy, while just 13 percent picked manufacturing.

  • Procurement Magazine: Tariffs: A New Approach to American Fashion Sourcing

    On a 4 August deadline, Procurement Magazine reports on the strengthening sourcing portfolio trend in USFIA's 2026 Benchmarking Study.

    Louis Fargher | August 4, 2026


    US fashion brands are solidifying supplier relationships instead of diversifying current portfolios as tariffs change the industry. 

    To tackle uncertainty around tariffs within the fashion industry, US brands are choosing consolidation over diversification, according to a 2026 study by the US Fashion Industry Association.

    The study says: “Companies are moving beyond short-term crisis response and increasingly adopting longer-term strategies focused on supply chain optimisation, compliance capabilities and operational resilience.”

    Due to this strategic shift, procurement teams within US fashion companies face the task of balancing existing supplier relationships with new agreements.

    Respondents to the survey revealed that the impact of tariffs is the top business challenge for US fashion brands, jumping from fourth in 2024.

    A new sourcing strategy

    According to the US Fashion Industry Association’s study, the mission for fashion companies is to work “more closely with key strategic partners overseas that offer sourcing flexibility”.

    Around 58% of US fashion brands are diversifying sourcing, which is a decrease from 83% in 2024.

    This increase represents a shift in how procurement teams are managing supplier relationships, focusing on partnerships with a smaller number of vendors.

    Renegotiating existing contracts with suppliers has increased from 61% in 2025, with 63% of companies agreeing extended deals with current suppliers in 2026.

    Rise in nearshoring to battle tariffs

    There has been a slight increase in domestic sourcing and nearshoring within the industry during 2026, the study found.

    CAFTA-DR is a trade pact that involves the US, the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, Guatemala, EL Salvador, Nicaragua and Honduras.

    According to the study, 76% of respondents sourced its products from CAFTA-DR members, a 12% rise from 2025.

    The free trade agreement between these countries reduces tariffs, but every CAFTA nation has its own overall tax requirements.

    Nearshoring can appeal to procurement teams due to proximity,with more than 65% of respondents citing access to duty-free benefits as one of the most important incentives for sourcing from CAFTA-DR members and Mexico.

    By choosing to strengthen relationships with existing suppliers over sourcing new agreements, procurement teams can mitigate tariff impact.


    Read the full article here. 

  • Quinnipiac: 51% Oppose Trump Tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China

    Quinnipiac University reports that 51% of registered voters oppose Trump’s threatened tariffs against Mexico, Canada and China, while 38% support them. Unsurprisingly, 76% of Republicans support the plan, while 89% of Democrats and 53% of independents opposed the tariff plan. Neither a majority of men (47%) nor women (30%) support the tariffs, though 53% of registered voters without a 4-year college degree support them.

About

The United States Fashion Industry Association (USFIA) is dedicated to fashion made possible by global trade.

USFIA represents brands, retailers, importers, and wholesalers based in the United States and doing business globally. Founded in 1989, USFIA works to eliminate tariff and non-tariff barriers that impede the fashion industry’s ability to trade freely and create jobs in the United States.

Headquartered in Washington, DC, USFIA is the voice of the fashion industry in front of the U.S. government as well as international governments and stakeholders.  With constant, two-way communication, USFIA staff and counsel serve as the eyes and ears of our members in Washington and around the world, enabling them to stay ahead of the regulatory challenges of today and tomorrow. Through our publications, educational events, and networking opportunities, USFIA also connects with key stakeholders across the value chain including U.S. and international service providers, suppliers, and industry groups.

 

News

The State of Tariffs

President Trump has made sweeping changes to U.S. tariffs since he began his second term in January 2025. From the Liberation Day tariffs to the various Section 122 and 301 investigations and tariffs, U.S. trade has shifted more in the past year than almost anytime in history. USFIA is pleased to provide the following resources to those wanting to learn more about the state of tariffs in 2026.

fas fa-chart-line
10
Current baseline tariff on all trading partners

Imposed under Section 122, these temporary tariffs are set to expire on July 24, 2026.

fas fa-earth-americas
60
Countries threatened with Section 301 forced labor tariffs

A new 10% or 12.5% tariff on 60 U.S. trading partners under USTR's Section 301 forced labor investigation.

fas fa-money-bill-trend-up
121.7
in potential and certified refunds accepted in CAPE

CBP has accepted over a hundred billion in potentials and certified refunds since opening CAPE as of July 10, 2026.

Events

Reports

2026 USFIA Fashion Industry Benchmarking Study

The 2026 USFIA Fashion Industry Benchmarking study is now available to the public! Key findings from the report include:

  • The top business challenges facing U.S. fashion companies continue to center on the Trump Administration’s tariff policies, though concerns over inflation and increasing costs have also risen since 2025. 
  • 92% of respondents rated “Protectionist U.S. trade policies and related policy uncertainty, including the impact of the Trump tariffs” as one of their top two business challenges in 2026.
  • Among business concerns, managing forced-labor risks emerged as a significantly higher priority, rising from tenth place in 2025 to sixth place in 2026 and illustrating the industry's commitment to eradicating forced labor from their supply chains.
  • The job market is a bright spot. About 87% of companies plan to increase hiring over the next five years, up from last year and tying the highest level since the pandemic. Demand is expected to be strongest for data scientists, trade compliance specialists, and environmental sustainability specialists
  • AI is becoming increasingly integrated into apparel sourcing and business operations. 56% utilize AI for "demand forecasting and inventory planning," while 50% use it for "sustainability tracking," "risk management" and “sourcing strategy and cost optimization.”

Download the 2026 study here.

If you're interested in sharing your company's perspective for our 2027 study, fill out the interest form.

 Benchmarking 2026 top business challenges


Higher tariffs continue to trigger ripple effects across supply chains.

Figure 1-3 U.S. fashion companies reported deepened economic impacts of tariff hikes and policy uncertainties on their sourcing and business operations

Figure 1-4 U.S. fashion companies explored various methods to mitigate the evolving impacts of tariff hikes and policy uncertainties

 


Trends to watch: 

AI use could become increasingly prevalent in apparel sourcing as companies seek new technologies to improve operational efficiency and navigate a more complex, uncertain sourcing environment.Figure 2-24 AI is increasingly integrated into apparel sourcing and business operations


 

2026 Sourcing Trends & Outlook

USFIA's 2026 Sourcing Trends & Outlook is out with data from the full year of 2025. Members can log-in to the website to download it here. 

This is the thirteenth USFIA Sourcing Trends & Outlook Report, our annual look at the sourcing landscape for the fashion industry. 2025 will be remembered as the year of the Trump tariffs. U.S. imports fell as brands and retailers had to navigate a new level of uncertainty for sourcing and for costs. The reciprocal tariffs affected all countries, except for USMCA-qualifying production from Canada and Mexico.

As we look ahead to 2026, there still is a lot of uncertainty. The reciprocal tariffs were struck down by the Supreme Court, but the Trump Administration still is committed to impose tariffs above the MFN rates. The global tariffs imposed under Section 122 expire on July 24th and Administration officials say they will use other trade laws such as Section 301 and Section 232 to authorize more tariffs.

Even with the tariff disruptions, some of the major sourcing trends remain the same as in recent years. Asian suppliers continue to dominate apparel sourcing. The top seven apparel suppliers are China, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, and Pakistan, and they ship 78% of apparel imports.

The top 5 sourcing trends in the report are:

  1. Asian apparel suppliers continue to dominate sourcing.
  2. China maintains its role as the top apparel supplier by quantity, and Vietnam is the top supplier by value.
  3. Average unit values for textiles and apparel imports had only modest increases.
  4. Some of the fastest growth in 2025 comes from major apparel suppliers.
  5. Despite tariff disruptions, FTAs and preference programs remain underutilized. CAFTA remains the major duty-free supplier.

 

While U.S. apparel imports decreased from many suppliers, there still are some clear winners from the tariff disruptions. Five of the top ten suppliers had double digit increases. Some of the fastest-growing suppliers are Asian-based apparel industries that took market share from China.

sourcing2026 fastest growing apparel suppliers

 

sourcing2026 applied tariff rates

Chart courtesy of Dr. Sheng Lu, Professor in the Department of Fashion and Apparel Studies, University of Delaware.

Partners

Subscribe to USFIA's Mailing List